![]() ![]() Hi Bill, I found this on the Sourceforge discussion threads which seems to explain the differences between the indexes. The 4100 set is an alternative index set for wide FOV imaging, not recommended for anything narrower than 3 degrees. As I read that thread the 41xx indexes may be appropriate for my 3.5 degree FOV. I set it up using this : The connection is ASCOM scope and then Celestron. The problem seems to be not communication with the mount. It took a photo and goes trough the process, so it communicate with the camera. I get a "Failed to Solve" message in the end. I installed in win 10 AstroTortilla-0.7.0.0-圆4 and cygwin setup-x86 and cygwin x86_64 but it is the same result. ![]() Sent from my iPadĪfter capture and solve i have this message in log, see join files. I’m new to this but can I put on 0 for focal length and get my effective focal length from this? I have a sct 9.25 and depending on spacers the fl changes so I need to know what indexes to get. if you know your camera sensor pixel size and pixel dimensions. A solved image will display actual field of view dimensions. It would add a few seconds to solution, but noting drastic. ![]() You can enter Scale Min and Scale max to cover the entire range of FOVs that you might encounter. John Where are you entering the focal length? The Astrotortilla GUI does not require it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |